ABPDE5
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I'm considering a couple different wheel / tire setups, as I've pretty much worn through the stock PS4Ss.
One of the options on the table right now is the HRC Titan7 TS-5 (18x10 et55). From a functional standpoint, I think this is probably the best choice. In addition to tire compatibility, it does an excellent job of adhering as closely as possible to the stock scrub radius while adding width. It's also an attractive value proposition at just over $500 / wheel for a forged option from a reputable manufacturer. But, from a purely aesthetic standpoint, I'd prefer a more aggressive fitment with more poke (I really like how the 10" et 40 and 10.5" et 45-47 options look with approx. ~ 25mm). In general, I'd prefer not to run spacers -- especially if I'm buying wheels and have the option of desired fitment -- but the following thought did cross my mind...
I could run the wheels stock up front, preserving the scrub radius, and with spacers in the rear, filling out the wider rear fenders and giving the car more of an aggressive look. I don't love this idea (in fact I mostly hate it), but I figured I'd ask those with more experience than myself:
How significant would the impact to handling be if I was to run 15mm spacers in the rear (meaning rear track is 30mm wider than front)?
I understand this leads to increased understeer, which is not desirable on FWD cars and really fights what the engineers have tried to achieve with this platform. But, I am curious if I am just being resistant to this idea "in principle" and if the reality of a 15mm / side variance in offset is likely to be materially significant in real world scenarios.
Any feedback from those with lots of seat time, etc.? Thanks!
One of the options on the table right now is the HRC Titan7 TS-5 (18x10 et55). From a functional standpoint, I think this is probably the best choice. In addition to tire compatibility, it does an excellent job of adhering as closely as possible to the stock scrub radius while adding width. It's also an attractive value proposition at just over $500 / wheel for a forged option from a reputable manufacturer. But, from a purely aesthetic standpoint, I'd prefer a more aggressive fitment with more poke (I really like how the 10" et 40 and 10.5" et 45-47 options look with approx. ~ 25mm). In general, I'd prefer not to run spacers -- especially if I'm buying wheels and have the option of desired fitment -- but the following thought did cross my mind...
I could run the wheels stock up front, preserving the scrub radius, and with spacers in the rear, filling out the wider rear fenders and giving the car more of an aggressive look. I don't love this idea (in fact I mostly hate it), but I figured I'd ask those with more experience than myself:
How significant would the impact to handling be if I was to run 15mm spacers in the rear (meaning rear track is 30mm wider than front)?
I understand this leads to increased understeer, which is not desirable on FWD cars and really fights what the engineers have tried to achieve with this platform. But, I am curious if I am just being resistant to this idea "in principle" and if the reality of a 15mm / side variance in offset is likely to be materially significant in real world scenarios.
Any feedback from those with lots of seat time, etc.? Thanks!
Sponsored