ashmostro
Senior Member
- Thread starter
- #31
I am very familiar with Thiele's work, as one of the godfathers of loudspeaker engineering and the first half of the 'T-S' parameters.While movement in a driver doesn't have much friction, it still has suspension to fight through. Bigger woofer, more weight, more coils all need more suspension which means more resistance and ultimately more power to drive. Look up the part 1 and part 2 research papers titled "Loudspeakers in Vented Boxes" and they go over exactly this.
This work details how a speaker *system* behaves in various enclosures and how its electrical and mechanical attributes interact with that enclosure. It's all foundational and excellent work and I take no issue with it at all.
I think what's being misunderstood here is that sensitivity is a measured outcome of all of the above. Once you have two 8" subwoofers in ideal enclosures and measure their sensitivity, whichever one is more sensitive is louder and less "resistant to motion". Bringing it back to the original point, the Audiofrog will always be louder than the Rockford in identical sealed boxes, at any power level. And its frequency response will also be optimal at any power level, until you hit the mechanical limits of the suspension.... and that's why the AF is still better. It has more linear Xmax so it's both more efficient and has more high-power potential. It's just a better sub for this application.
Sponsored