Line level vs speaker level. I'm not sure it would be worth the effort, just curious.That would be quite easy actually. But I'm curious - why, when you can just intercept the signal at the sub in the trunk? What's your design goal?
Ah, sorry I wasn't clear at all. Tapping into the signal at the amp or the sub is the same thing. They are all speaker level outputs. The factory system has no line level inputs, just a single stereo digital input that the amp converts to analog and then amplifies after processing it.Line level vs speaker level. I'm not sure it would be worth the effort, just curious.
That's what I would have expected. I misinterpreted your explanation of the connector... wishful thinkingAh, sorry I wasn't clear at all. Tapping into the signal at the amp or the sub is the same thing. They are all speaker level outputs. The factory system has no line level inputs, just a single stereo digital input that the amp converts to analog and then amplifies after processing it.
The t harness I'm proposing would be to intercept every single speaker output signal so you can use a DSP to reconstruct the original signal with assuming and eq. This is the most common factory integration approach. But as you suggest, it's not the highest fidelity solution which is why I'm going full digital.
For your sub-only use case it would be unnecessary complexity and wouldn't change the sound quality at all vs tapping in at the sub since it's electrically identical.
Yeah we're not, but we are getting slightly closer on some ends. When I can get an ai to truly replace me, I'll be in my happy place!I used AI for a lot of this but it was pretty useless for the newer non-documented connectors like the 26 pin one I took months to find. It's literally not even on the manufacturer's website yet, so AI was totally useless and pointed me to the wrong connectors over and over again.
We're not at AGI yet....