Ngl, before this I've never heard about the K5. I watched a review on it and it seems pretty great value. I tried reading conversations online, and it seems like most people have an issue that it's a Kia more than anything. It even looks better than the Elantra and Sonata imo. From what I've...
If you don't care about performance and only the luxury features, then yes it's "worth it" from what I've heard. Personally, I don't think so because the power is the same if not a bit slower than compared to the Si which is why I'm on the fence of either a Type S or A-spec non-tech. I see OTD...
I'm feeling the same way except I do expect around 270 not 300. I know the Integra is big on luxury features, but that really isn't too important for me personally. I'm mainly interested in the liftback design, exterior, and for me it has to be an auto. I'd settle for an Integra A-spec if only...
Yup. Personally, I could never justify the cost at least for a manual. Mid 30s is really 35k with destination and handling is 37k with add-ons is reaching 40k. I'm guessing Type S will end up reaching around 44k~45k?
I'm 90% sure there won't be SH-AWD and it'll have more like 270HP maybe even 250HP. At least that's what I'm expecting. Wouldn't it be outperforming the TLX Type S if it even had one over the other with more cabin space and less weight?
Don't mind that guy he's a pretty ardent Acura/Integra defender. He has his own narrative.
I agree. People complaining the torsion beam makes the Mazda not luxury better have said the same thing about the CVT on the Integra. Personally, I see the Integra as more of an Si Hatchback than luxury...
Same. I got a car that works and I think the Type S should provide more value. Not exactly the best time to buy either and I rather wait another MY to iron out any issues.
People on this forums are talking about the "flakes" in the paint. His only issue is that you're criticizing Acura and not praising them in every comment. Who's surprised?